Last Updated: 5/22/21 | may 22nd, 2021
A few years ago, I was in San Francisco to check out the Google travel offices, where we spent a lot of time geeking out over travel booking data and metrics. one of the stats that stood out for me was that a lot of consumers spend over 40 hours and look at over 20 web sites researching their trip.
When I started planning my first round-the-world trip in 2005, there weren’t as lots of online resources. I remember a blog on backpacking Europe (basically what a girl did on her study abroad and her notes from the road), a couple of online forums, and random web sites here and there.
My trip planning consisted mostly of using guidebooks.
Today, we have 100,000+ blogs, travel forums and online communities, Youtube channels, Instagram pages, apps, and sharing-economy websites, and everything in between.
You can find information for anywhere you want to go.
No destination is too obscure.
There is a figurative firehose of information online.
But, in this sea of limitless information, how do you know what information and recommendations are accurate and trustworthy, especially when so much content is sponsored by companies?
Like you, I spend a lot of time researching destinations before I go. I read blog posts, books, trip reports, hostel reviews, get guidebooks, and leave no stone unturned.
I love digging deep into the places I’m traveling to. It makes the trip seem real and gives me the feeling like I’m unearthing deep secrets.
Planning a trip gives you ownership of your journey. It’s an integral part of the travel experience.
But, considering that I’ve been looking up information online and working in the travel industry for years, I can spot the BS/paid/sponsored content really easily.
There’s a lot of bad information out there that will lead you astray.
And today I want to help you spot it.
(Note: I’m going to break down my thoughts in extreme detail, but it actually doesn’t take that long to process all this. I’ll give you some perspective at the end. It’s not as long as you think!)
Part One: aspects to consider When reading about Destinations
1. Sponsored Content
Whenever I come across an article, I scroll to the bottom to see if it is “sponsored.” Sponsored content is (a) when a blogger is given a trip or product in exchange for a review or mention on that blogger’s website, or (b) content that is generally advertising or marketing material (think some “awesome” contest they are telling you wat betreft).
While organized press trips have occurred in the travel service for decades (and I’ve done them), sponsored content is something different.
A press trip is an unpaid experience where writers check out a destination in buy to write about it. In this case, there’s no exchange of money. And, while there’s probably a little quid pro quo, I think when compared to sponsored content, it’s a lot more honest. (I still take press trip content with a grain of salt though).
A sponsored post always has an exchange of money. That’s what changes the dynamic for me. That makes it marketing (for reasons that tie together below). A person was paid specifically to write great things.
I’ll read the post (it still might be useful) but I don’t put as much weight into the recommendations as I would an unsponsored post. After all, the writer was paid to write about the place and there is a natural human inclination to sugarcoat the negatives if we’ve been paid to write about a place or product.
When I see “Thanks for the complimentary trip, (insert tourism board name). All opinions are my own” without explanation, I’m also wary. What was free? What was paid for? Did they receive money? how do I know what is true and what isn’t?
Thus, I’m normally a lot more skeptical of the content unless I see clearly what was sponsored.
When I went to Islay, the tourism board covered a lot of my trip: “Visit Islay supplied the car and accommodation and also connected me to distilleries so I could get the behind-the-scenes excursions for this article. Meals, flights, and transportation to and from the island — as well as all that whisky I gotten — were at my own expense. They did not pay me directly for coverage.”
This is what I look for. I want the author to be clear on what was and wasn’t paid for – because that will directly impact some of the other crucial things to keep an eye.
2. Replicable Experiences
If the writer is writing about an experience that I can’t do or a situation I can’t replicate, the recommendations isn’t beneficial to me as a reader. It’s great that someone got to do something cool like eat at a 3-star Michelin restaurant and cook dinner with the chef — but how does that really help me experience the place?
How will that make my trip better?
Those kinds of articles make for fun stories but nothing more. When I’m researching a destination, I don’t want a fun story. I want a helpful story.
3. in-depth Content
How in-depth is the article? The a lot more facts, figures, and other details they include, the a lot more I know they know their stuff. For me, recommendations that is detailed, practical, and replicable is the best kind of advice. I look for blogs and content that give me insight into a destination or product like I would expect from a guidebook or magazine.
All these signals tell me “This web site has quality and trustworthy content and I must use it to plan my trip.”
This is why whether or not the content is sponsored/branded/whatever term people use is so crucial to me because the a lot more the writer is paying their own way and doing what I would do, it’s a lot more likely to include the nitty-gritty facts and figures that will be beneficial to me as I plan my trip.
4. bigger Picture
I look at that content within the bigger picture of their website. If I come across an post and I like what I’m reading, sponsored or not, I click around the web site a bit more. If this blogger tends to do the kind of activities I like to do, I think to myself, “OK, we have a similar travel style. This person’s recommendations is going to benefit me.”
If I look around a web site and see they mostly pay their own way, have in-depth content, and are in the trenches like the rest of us, I’m ok with the small amount of sponsored content I see because, in my mind, it will be a lot more fair and balanced than someone who does mostly paid trips.
5. web site Appearance
What does their web site look like? Does it look loved? Is the design from 1999, or does it look like someone keeps the site up to date?
While looks don’t 100% correlate to quality food, you’re a lot more likely to go “the food is probably good here” if the restaurant looks like it wasn’t like renovated during the Nixon years.
For example, look at my site:
In 2008:
Nutsvoorzieningen:
Which one would you depend on more? (Exactly. The newer version.)
6. Are They too Negative?
There are so lots of aspects that go into whether or not you like a destination: the people you meet, the weather, the ease with which you got around, whether someone in your dorm snored, and so much more! When I look at someone’s opinion on a place, I look to see if they are just ranting or are genuinely being fair. “This place was horrible and you must never go” is a rant that must be taken with a grain of salt. read it, file it away, but mostly neglect it.
Years ago, I went on a rant about Vietnam and swore I would never go back. considering that then, I’ve grown as a writer and a person. I had to add a little blurb at the end of the post saying this was my experience but you must go and experience it yourself.
That post stays up because it’s part of the site, but I flinch when I read it. It’s not the type of post that gives an accurate picture of a place nor is it one you must use when you plan your trip. avoid articles like that.
7. timely Content
Lastly, how old is the article? When was it last updated? travel changes so rapidly that an post that was written five years ago and hasn’t been updated considering that is one I don’t value. If the post hasn’t been updated within the last two years, skip it!
Part Two: What to consider When Researching a Company
1. a lot of reviews are Negative
First, when it pertains to using a company or booking web site you don’t know, it’s crucial to remember one thing: the majority of reviews are a lot of likely going to be negative.
Consumers use review sites to complain, not to praise. It’s nearly always how some company screwed them over. While that is often the case (no company is best 100% of the time — and it’s not just obscure companies; I’ve had pals have horrible times trying to get a refund from Expedia), a lot of of the time it’s because someone didn’t read the fine print.
So that’s the most crucial thing to remember: consumer reviews always tilt negative in the travel space, so you shouldn’t be too anxious if a company has too lots of negative reviews (the devil is in the details, not some star rating!).
2. consider Why a review is Negative
When checking out consumer reviews, I look to see why these people are having a negative experience. For example, if a lot of of the negative reviews for a excursion company talk about how their guide didn’t know anything, I begin to think, “Maybe this excursion company isn’t that good.”
But if the negative reviews are mostly “THIS IS the worst company ever because MY hotel WAS only 2 stars and I expected 5 stars FOR THE $500 I PAID!” then I’ll neglect those certain negative reviews.
To me, these kinds of reviews are just rants, not helpful.
3. expert Opinion
What do travel writers, magazines, and newspapers say about this company? Do they match the negative consumer reviews, or do they paint the company in a different light? If excursion company X has tons of negative consumer reviews but the majority of professionals say it is good, I’ll opt for the professional opinion. If thEr is een ontkoppeling tussen wat consumenten zeggen en wat de meerderheid van de experts zeggen, ik ben afhankelijk van de experts.
Dat gezegd hebbende, ik zal er ook op kijken om ervoor te zorgen dat de experts niet worden betaald om te zeggen wat ze zeggen. Veel reismagazines krijgen gelieerde betalingen of commissies van reis-/tourbedrijven. Voordat ik hun mening weegt, controleer ik het dubbele om ervoor te zorgen dat ze niet worden betaald om het te zeggen.
4. Onderzoek naar beoordelingen
Overweeg vervolgens de volgende vijf punten bij het uitchecken van beoordelingen:
Hoe meestal een recensent-artikelen-bij het bekijken van door gebruikers gegenereerde beoordelingen, wil ik zien hoe meestal een gebruikersartikelen (de meeste sites u laten zien). Als iemand slechts één keer artikelen en een vernietigende beoordeling schrijft, is de kans groot dat ze proberen te ventileren omdat ze niet hebben gekregen wat ze willen.
Pas op voor te positieve beoordelingen-mensen houden er niet van om de gevoelens van andere mensen te kwetsen, dus op veel van de sites voor het delen van de delen-economie, zijn mensen suikerjas met hun beoordelingen, omdat deze gastheren of gidsen geen gezichtsloze onderneming zijn.
Als iemand je een excursie gaf of als je in iemands huis bleef en het zoog, zul je je slecht voelen als je een zeer negatieve recensie achterlaat omdat je die persoon hebt ontmoet en een (vluchtige) relatie met hen heeft gevormd.
Pas op voor een gebrek aan details – dit is hoe ik in een Airbnb ben beland die direct boven een bar lag. Iedereen zei: “Het was luidruchtig”, maar NYC is luidruchtig, dus ik ging er gewoon van uit dat is wat ze bedoelden.
Sinds dat vreselijke incident ben ik alleen afhankelijk van beoordelingen die specifiek zijn, details en duidelijk over wat goed was en wat slecht was. “Ik had een geweldige tijd” of “Deze plek was zo zo” vertelt je niets en die beoordelingen moeten worden genegeerd.
Pas op voor betaalde plaatsingen – Zorg ervoor dat de beste beoordelingen geen betaalde plaatsingen zijn. De meeste boekingssites stellen bedrijven in staat om extra te betalen voor hogere of top “aanbevolen” plaatsing. Al die topresultaten? normaal betaald om daar te zijn.
Dus doe wat ik doe: verwaarloos de top-aanbevolen eigenschappen, sorteer op prijs en zoek vervolgens uit waar te boeken.
Zijn er foto’s? – Ten slotte, als ik naar boekingsites kijk, zie ik ook graag welke foto’s mensen die daar zijn gebleven, hebben gepost. Natuurlijk is het hebben van een professionele fotograaf een foto versus iemand die een foto maakt met zijn telefoon, twee heel verschillende dingen, maar ik vind het leuk om in ieder geval een idee te krijgen van hoe de kamer eruit ziet in een real-world setting.
***
Geen van deze punten maken of breken mijn planning op zichzelf. Ik kijk naar alles en kijk hoe het complete beeld eruit ziet. Ik zoek naar patronen en gemiddelden. Dat is iets dat je niet echt kunt vervalsen. afhankelijk van het gemiddelde.
Dit klinkt misschien alsof het veel werk kost, maar het is eigenlijk gewoon een lange, langdurige geschreven versie van wat ik in gedachten houd terwijl ik onderzoek. In werkelijkheid duurt deze lijst slechts enkele minuten om in je hoofd door te rennen.
Door deze factoren op een of andere manier te zoeken, komt u zelden op een plek die u niet leuk vindt, met behulp van een bedrijf dat u verpest of onnauwkeurige en nutteloze informatie krijgt.
Hoe de wereld op $ 50 per dag te reizen
My new York Times best-selling paperback guide to world travel will show you how to master the art of travel so that you’ll get off the beaten path, save money, and have a deeper travel experience. Het is uw A tot Z -planningsgids die de BBC de ‘Bijbel voor budgetreizigers’ noemde.
Click here to learn a lot more and start reading it today!
Book Your Trip: Logistical ideas and Tricks
Book Your Flight
Find a cheap flight by using Skyscanner. It’s my favorite search engine because it searches web sites and airlines around the globe so you always know no stone is left unturned.
Book Your Accommodation
U kunt uw hostel met Hostelworld boeken. If you want to stay somewhere other than a hostel, use Booking.com as they consistently return the least expensive rates for guesthouses and hotels.
Don’t forget travel Insurance
Travel insurance will secure you against illness, injury, theft, and cancellations. It’s detailed protection in case anything goes wrong. I never go on a trip without it as I’ve had to use it lots of times in the past